We have a JUMBO (loan amounts over $417,000) rate at 6.49% / 6.154% APR!
Call me for Details!
Karen L. Heston
Mortgage Banker
BOk Mortgage
p-(918)488-7353
f- (918)280-3390
Online application - click here
Virtual Business Card - Karen Heston
Thursday, June 26, 2008
Thursday, June 12, 2008
Back in the Headlines -Seller Funded Down Payments
HUD again seeks end to seller-funded loans
Real estate roundup
By Inman News, Tuesday, June 10, 2008.
The following is a real estate news roundup:
HUD still trying to end seller-funded loans
The Bush administration is again moving forward with a proposal to ban seller-funded down-payment assistance for FHA-backed loans, reopening the public comment period on the plan for 60 days. The Department of Housing and Urban Development was forced to reopen an administrative proceeding on the rule change after a judge ruled it did not adequately explain its reasons for reversing past policy on seller-funded loans -- a practice it defended as recently as 2005 (see Inman News story).
Now HUD argues that the loans artificially inflate home prices and are three times more likely to end up in foreclosure. In a speech Monday to the National Press Club, Assistant Secretary for -Housing Brian Montgomery said that HUD had $4.6 billion in unanticipated losses -- mostly due to increased seller-funded loans -- and could require taxpayer assistance to continue operating for the first time in its 74-year history if it is not permitted to take action to mitigate its losses. No private mortgage insurance companies back such loans, Montgomery said, which now account for one-third of FHA's guarantee portfolio.
Nehemiah Corp. of America, one of three nonprofits that sued HUD in order to continue their seller-funded down-payment assistance programs, issued a statement saying the loans have been "enormously successful" in helping low- to middle-income families become homeowners, and calling HUD's decision to move forward with a ban "astonishing."
If I can assist you on any of your mortgage needs, please call me at
Karen L Heston
BOk Mortgage
918-488-7353
Real estate roundup
By Inman News, Tuesday, June 10, 2008.
The following is a real estate news roundup:
HUD still trying to end seller-funded loans
The Bush administration is again moving forward with a proposal to ban seller-funded down-payment assistance for FHA-backed loans, reopening the public comment period on the plan for 60 days. The Department of Housing and Urban Development was forced to reopen an administrative proceeding on the rule change after a judge ruled it did not adequately explain its reasons for reversing past policy on seller-funded loans -- a practice it defended as recently as 2005 (see Inman News story).
Now HUD argues that the loans artificially inflate home prices and are three times more likely to end up in foreclosure. In a speech Monday to the National Press Club, Assistant Secretary for -Housing Brian Montgomery said that HUD had $4.6 billion in unanticipated losses -- mostly due to increased seller-funded loans -- and could require taxpayer assistance to continue operating for the first time in its 74-year history if it is not permitted to take action to mitigate its losses. No private mortgage insurance companies back such loans, Montgomery said, which now account for one-third of FHA's guarantee portfolio.
Nehemiah Corp. of America, one of three nonprofits that sued HUD in order to continue their seller-funded down-payment assistance programs, issued a statement saying the loans have been "enormously successful" in helping low- to middle-income families become homeowners, and calling HUD's decision to move forward with a ban "astonishing."
If I can assist you on any of your mortgage needs, please call me at
Karen L Heston
BOk Mortgage
918-488-7353
Friday, June 6, 2008
1st Quarter Mortgage Delinquencies Hit Highest Level Since 1979
1st Quarter Mortgage Delinquencies Hit Highest Level Since 1979
The delinquency rate for mortgage loans on one- to four-unit residential properties stood at 6.35% of all loans outstanding at the end of the first quarter of 2008 on a seasonally adjusted basis, up from 4.84% in the first quarter of 2007, the Mortgage Bankers Association reported Thursday, based on its National Delinquency Survey.
The seasonally adjusted total delinquency rate is the highest recorded in the MBA survey since 1979.
The delinquency rate includes loans that are at least one payment past due but does not include loans in the process of foreclosure. The portion of loans in foreclosure was 2.47% at the end of the first quarter, up from 1.28% a year earlier. The portion of loans on which foreclosure actions were started during the quarter was 0.99% on a seasonally adjusted basis, up from 0.58% a year earlier, MBA’s survey found.
The increase in the overall delinquency rate was driven by increases in the number of loans 60 and 90 or more days past due, primarily in California and Florida, MBA reports. The 30-day delinquency percentage is still below levels seen as recently as 2002.
However, the rate of foreclosure starts and the portion of loans in the process of foreclosure both were at the highest levels recorded since 1979.
“The magnitude of the national increases is clearly driven by certain loan types and certain states,” Jay Brinkmann, MBA’s vice president for research and economics, said in a news release. “For example, while subprime ARMs represent 6% of the loans outstanding, they represented 39% of the foreclosures started during the first quarter.”
In contrast, prime ARMs represent 15% of the loans outstanding but 23% of the foreclosures started. Of approximately 516,000 foreclosures started during the first quarter, subprime ARM loans accounted for about 195,000 and prime ARM loans 117,000, but the increase in prime ARM foreclosures exceeded subprime ARM foreclosures by 29,000 and 20,000, respectively, over the previous quarter.
“The problems in California and Florida are extraordinary,” Brinkmann commented. The quarterly rate of foreclosure starts on subprime ARM loans in California was 9.24% and 8.25% in Florida, driving up the national average foreclosure start rate. California saw approximately 109,000 foreclosure starts and Florida 77,000 during the March quarter.
Mortgage Applications Fell Last Week
The Mortgage Bankers Association’s Market Composite Index for the week ended May 30 was 502.3, down 15.3% on a seasonally adjusted basis from 593.3 one week earlier. The results were adjusted to account for the Memorial Day holiday.
The Refinance Index fell 25.7% to 1496.1 from 2013.5 the previous week and the seasonally adjusted Purchase Index slipped 5.4% lower to 333.6 from 352.7 one week earlier. The Conventional Purchase Index fell 6.1%.
The refinance share of mortgage activity declined to 40.6% of total applications from 46.1% the previous week. The adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) share of activity decreased to 8.7% from 9.3% of total applications from the previous week.
The average contract interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages increased to 6.17% from 5.96%. The average rate for 15-year fixed-rate mortgages rose to 5.7% from 5.49%, and the rate for one-year ARMs fell to 6.8% from 6.92%.
© 2008 CreditandCollectionsWorld.com and SourceMedia, Inc. All rights reserved.
© 2008 CreditandCollectionsWorld.com and SourceMedia, Inc. All rights reserved.
The delinquency rate for mortgage loans on one- to four-unit residential properties stood at 6.35% of all loans outstanding at the end of the first quarter of 2008 on a seasonally adjusted basis, up from 4.84% in the first quarter of 2007, the Mortgage Bankers Association reported Thursday, based on its National Delinquency Survey.
The seasonally adjusted total delinquency rate is the highest recorded in the MBA survey since 1979.
The delinquency rate includes loans that are at least one payment past due but does not include loans in the process of foreclosure. The portion of loans in foreclosure was 2.47% at the end of the first quarter, up from 1.28% a year earlier. The portion of loans on which foreclosure actions were started during the quarter was 0.99% on a seasonally adjusted basis, up from 0.58% a year earlier, MBA’s survey found.
The increase in the overall delinquency rate was driven by increases in the number of loans 60 and 90 or more days past due, primarily in California and Florida, MBA reports. The 30-day delinquency percentage is still below levels seen as recently as 2002.
However, the rate of foreclosure starts and the portion of loans in the process of foreclosure both were at the highest levels recorded since 1979.
“The magnitude of the national increases is clearly driven by certain loan types and certain states,” Jay Brinkmann, MBA’s vice president for research and economics, said in a news release. “For example, while subprime ARMs represent 6% of the loans outstanding, they represented 39% of the foreclosures started during the first quarter.”
In contrast, prime ARMs represent 15% of the loans outstanding but 23% of the foreclosures started. Of approximately 516,000 foreclosures started during the first quarter, subprime ARM loans accounted for about 195,000 and prime ARM loans 117,000, but the increase in prime ARM foreclosures exceeded subprime ARM foreclosures by 29,000 and 20,000, respectively, over the previous quarter.
“The problems in California and Florida are extraordinary,” Brinkmann commented. The quarterly rate of foreclosure starts on subprime ARM loans in California was 9.24% and 8.25% in Florida, driving up the national average foreclosure start rate. California saw approximately 109,000 foreclosure starts and Florida 77,000 during the March quarter.
Mortgage Applications Fell Last Week
The Mortgage Bankers Association’s Market Composite Index for the week ended May 30 was 502.3, down 15.3% on a seasonally adjusted basis from 593.3 one week earlier. The results were adjusted to account for the Memorial Day holiday.
The Refinance Index fell 25.7% to 1496.1 from 2013.5 the previous week and the seasonally adjusted Purchase Index slipped 5.4% lower to 333.6 from 352.7 one week earlier. The Conventional Purchase Index fell 6.1%.
The refinance share of mortgage activity declined to 40.6% of total applications from 46.1% the previous week. The adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) share of activity decreased to 8.7% from 9.3% of total applications from the previous week.
The average contract interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages increased to 6.17% from 5.96%. The average rate for 15-year fixed-rate mortgages rose to 5.7% from 5.49%, and the rate for one-year ARMs fell to 6.8% from 6.92%.
© 2008 CreditandCollectionsWorld.com and SourceMedia, Inc. All rights reserved.
© 2008 CreditandCollectionsWorld.com and SourceMedia, Inc. All rights reserved.
Wednesday, May 28, 2008
The Truth Behind the Mortgage Flyer
Here's a different way to make the point we always harp on during the Future of Real Estate radio and television shows. The Mortgage Cicerone. Don't be fooled when you buy a home or refinance your house in Tulsa, OK.
Tuesday, May 27, 2008
Good News From Oklahoma House & Senate
Legislative Victories - May, 2008/News From Tulsa Metro Chamber of Commerce
The biggest achievement of the session is the passage today of the state bond issue to fund $25 million for Arkansas River improvements. The Oklahoma Senate voted 43-5 for the bond this morning and the House is expected to pass with a comfortable margin this afternoon. The money will fund improvements to the Zink dam and help construct two additional dams in Sand Springs and Jenks. This funding gives us money to add to the Vision 2025 funding and match the $50 million in federal funding Senator Jim Inhofe secured through the Water Resources Development Act last year. We will be able to actually see water in our river.
The transportation bond passed in the House today, 95-5 in favor, and the Senate is expected to pass as well, which gives us $300 million for projects in the “Eight Year Plan”. The deal includes raising the cap and removing the trigger, which will provide another $325 million over the next ten years, to full fund the project list in the plan. All of these funding elements were on the ONE VOICE list and were Chamber priorities.
The bond for $100 million to match the private gifts to Oklahoma colleges and universities for endowed chairs also passed in the Senate and is fully expected to pass the House.
The Legislature passed and the Governor has already signed SB 1943, the Oklahoma Local Development and Enterprise Zone Incentive Leverage Act. Authored by Sen. Mike Mazzei (R-Bixby), the bill provides incentives to develop major tourism attractions in Tulsa, Oklahoma City and at several resorts. This bill applies to designated enterprise zones, which for Tulsa would be in downtown and adjacent areas.
HB 3239, by Rep. Skye McNiel (R-Bristow) and Sen. Mike Mazzei (R-Bixby) offers incentives to employers and engineering employees in the aerospace industry. It is a ground-breaking package that will give some much needed tools to our burgeoning aerospace employers as they try to overcome significant nation-wide engineering shortages. The bill provides a $5,000/year tax credit for engineers hired by Oklahoma aerospace companies, a compensation based tax credit to aerospace employers (more for Oklahoma educated engineers than for those hired from out-of-state) and a tuition reimbursement tax credit for the employer of $1,800/year for up to four years if the company reimburses the employee for their tuition. This will be a really useful tool to attract young engineers to Oklahoma companies.
The Quality Jobs Act, SB 2163, was amended, thanks to Senator Mike Mazzei (R-Bixby) and Representative Ron Peters (R-Broken Arrow), to add NAICS codes covering two growing Tulsa companies, the Society of Engineering Geophysicists and Williams and Williams Worldwide Auction House. Both companies plan to grow considerably in Tulsa and more than meet the out-of-state revenue, salary and payroll criteria, but were excluded because their NAICS codes were not included in the statute. Qualifying for Oklahoma’s Quality Jobs help both companies resist efforts to lure them to Texas.
Sometimes it is just plain fun to share good news with everyone! All of the above is awesome for those of us that want our city and state to succeed and grow for the future.
Have a wonderful week!
Jeff Sargent
President-Residential Mortgage Division
ONB Bank & Trust Co
8908 S Yale Ave
Tulsa, OK 74137
Office: 918.481.6833
Cell: 918.636.0630
jeff_sargent@onbbank.com
The biggest achievement of the session is the passage today of the state bond issue to fund $25 million for Arkansas River improvements. The Oklahoma Senate voted 43-5 for the bond this morning and the House is expected to pass with a comfortable margin this afternoon. The money will fund improvements to the Zink dam and help construct two additional dams in Sand Springs and Jenks. This funding gives us money to add to the Vision 2025 funding and match the $50 million in federal funding Senator Jim Inhofe secured through the Water Resources Development Act last year. We will be able to actually see water in our river.
The transportation bond passed in the House today, 95-5 in favor, and the Senate is expected to pass as well, which gives us $300 million for projects in the “Eight Year Plan”. The deal includes raising the cap and removing the trigger, which will provide another $325 million over the next ten years, to full fund the project list in the plan. All of these funding elements were on the ONE VOICE list and were Chamber priorities.
The bond for $100 million to match the private gifts to Oklahoma colleges and universities for endowed chairs also passed in the Senate and is fully expected to pass the House.
The Legislature passed and the Governor has already signed SB 1943, the Oklahoma Local Development and Enterprise Zone Incentive Leverage Act. Authored by Sen. Mike Mazzei (R-Bixby), the bill provides incentives to develop major tourism attractions in Tulsa, Oklahoma City and at several resorts. This bill applies to designated enterprise zones, which for Tulsa would be in downtown and adjacent areas.
HB 3239, by Rep. Skye McNiel (R-Bristow) and Sen. Mike Mazzei (R-Bixby) offers incentives to employers and engineering employees in the aerospace industry. It is a ground-breaking package that will give some much needed tools to our burgeoning aerospace employers as they try to overcome significant nation-wide engineering shortages. The bill provides a $5,000/year tax credit for engineers hired by Oklahoma aerospace companies, a compensation based tax credit to aerospace employers (more for Oklahoma educated engineers than for those hired from out-of-state) and a tuition reimbursement tax credit for the employer of $1,800/year for up to four years if the company reimburses the employee for their tuition. This will be a really useful tool to attract young engineers to Oklahoma companies.
The Quality Jobs Act, SB 2163, was amended, thanks to Senator Mike Mazzei (R-Bixby) and Representative Ron Peters (R-Broken Arrow), to add NAICS codes covering two growing Tulsa companies, the Society of Engineering Geophysicists and Williams and Williams Worldwide Auction House. Both companies plan to grow considerably in Tulsa and more than meet the out-of-state revenue, salary and payroll criteria, but were excluded because their NAICS codes were not included in the statute. Qualifying for Oklahoma’s Quality Jobs help both companies resist efforts to lure them to Texas.
Sometimes it is just plain fun to share good news with everyone! All of the above is awesome for those of us that want our city and state to succeed and grow for the future.
Have a wonderful week!
Jeff Sargent
President-Residential Mortgage Division
ONB Bank & Trust Co
8908 S Yale Ave
Tulsa, OK 74137
Office: 918.481.6833
Cell: 918.636.0630
jeff_sargent@onbbank.com
Monday, May 12, 2008
FHA NEWS
FHA premiums to be based on risk
Pricing plan coincides with FHA expansion
By Inman News, Friday, May 9, 2008.
The Bush administration proposes to implement "risk-based" pricing of premiums paid by borrowers with government-backed loans beginning July 14 -- the same day guidelines for FHA loan guarantee programs are to be expanded to serve more delinquent borrowers.
The more flexible pricing structure, which would also allow FHA to reduce mortgage insurance premiums for some borrowers with good credit, is intended to enable the government to serve more troubled borrowers while protecting taxpayers from losses, HUD officials said. The proposed change in pricing will be published in the Federal Register for public comment on May 13.
Under the current pricing structure, all borrowers regardless of their credit standing pay 1.5 percent of loan balance up front and 0.5 percent a year. Under risk-based pricing, the upfront premium will range from 1.25 percent to 2.25 percent.
On a $150,000 mortgage, the difference between the existing 1.5 percent upfront premium and the 2.25 percent premium is about $7 per month, HUD says.
Risk-based pricing has been a controversial aspect of so-called "FHA modernization" legislation, with some opponents worried that borrowers who can least afford the fees will be overcharged. A sweeping housing bill approved by the House on Thursday would require FHA to refund extra premiums charged to higher-risk borrowers if they do not default on their loans.
The Bush administration says it needs to implement risk-based pricing to ensure that claims filed by lenders when FHA loans go bad are covered by premiums collected from borrowers, and not paid by taxpayers.
"By charging different premiums, FHA will operate like most other insurance companies," HUD said in a statement. "This premium structure will preserve lower premium costs for FHA's traditional borrowers, including low-income and minority families who have a strong credit history and save for a down payment."
Claims against FHA's insurance fund are expected to rise, in part because FHA loan limits have been increased to as much as $729,500 in high-cost markets, and also because of a new program aimed at helping troubled borrowers refinance into more affordable loans.
The new FHASecure program, rolled out by the Bush administration in August, was originally designed to help borrowers who had fallen behind on payments on adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) loans after an interest-rate reset.
On April 9, the administration said it would expand the FHASecure program by creating two new categories of eligible borrowers:
Borrowers with adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) loans who were late on two consecutive monthly mortgage payments or at two different times over the previous 12 months. FHA will require a 97 percent loan-to-value (LTV) ratio for these borrowers to refinance into a government-backed loan -- which in many cases would require lenders to write down some principal.
Borrowers with ARM loans who were late on three consecutive monthly mortgage payments or at three different times over the past 12 months. FHA will require a 90 percent LTV ratio for these borrowers to refinance.
HUD said the expanded FHASecure guidelines are set to be implemented on July 14 in conjunction with risk-based premium pricing.
HUD estimates that FHASecure has helped 150,000 borrowers refinance since the program was launched and that the expanded guidelines will help as many as 500,000 homeowners take advantage of the program by the end of the year. FHASecure accounted for $28.5 billion of the $68 billion in loans FHA has helped facilitate since September, HUD says.
Democrats are pushing for an even bigger, $300 billion expansion of FHA loan guarantee programs to enable up to 2 million FHA-backed refinance loans in cases where lenders agree to accept no more than 85 percent of a property's current appraised value. That plan, which is opposed by the Bush administration, is part of the housing bill HR 3121 approved by the House Thursday (see story).
***
Pricing plan coincides with FHA expansion
By Inman News, Friday, May 9, 2008.
The Bush administration proposes to implement "risk-based" pricing of premiums paid by borrowers with government-backed loans beginning July 14 -- the same day guidelines for FHA loan guarantee programs are to be expanded to serve more delinquent borrowers.
The more flexible pricing structure, which would also allow FHA to reduce mortgage insurance premiums for some borrowers with good credit, is intended to enable the government to serve more troubled borrowers while protecting taxpayers from losses, HUD officials said. The proposed change in pricing will be published in the Federal Register for public comment on May 13.
Under the current pricing structure, all borrowers regardless of their credit standing pay 1.5 percent of loan balance up front and 0.5 percent a year. Under risk-based pricing, the upfront premium will range from 1.25 percent to 2.25 percent.
On a $150,000 mortgage, the difference between the existing 1.5 percent upfront premium and the 2.25 percent premium is about $7 per month, HUD says.
Risk-based pricing has been a controversial aspect of so-called "FHA modernization" legislation, with some opponents worried that borrowers who can least afford the fees will be overcharged. A sweeping housing bill approved by the House on Thursday would require FHA to refund extra premiums charged to higher-risk borrowers if they do not default on their loans.
The Bush administration says it needs to implement risk-based pricing to ensure that claims filed by lenders when FHA loans go bad are covered by premiums collected from borrowers, and not paid by taxpayers.
"By charging different premiums, FHA will operate like most other insurance companies," HUD said in a statement. "This premium structure will preserve lower premium costs for FHA's traditional borrowers, including low-income and minority families who have a strong credit history and save for a down payment."
Claims against FHA's insurance fund are expected to rise, in part because FHA loan limits have been increased to as much as $729,500 in high-cost markets, and also because of a new program aimed at helping troubled borrowers refinance into more affordable loans.
The new FHASecure program, rolled out by the Bush administration in August, was originally designed to help borrowers who had fallen behind on payments on adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) loans after an interest-rate reset.
On April 9, the administration said it would expand the FHASecure program by creating two new categories of eligible borrowers:
Borrowers with adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) loans who were late on two consecutive monthly mortgage payments or at two different times over the previous 12 months. FHA will require a 97 percent loan-to-value (LTV) ratio for these borrowers to refinance into a government-backed loan -- which in many cases would require lenders to write down some principal.
Borrowers with ARM loans who were late on three consecutive monthly mortgage payments or at three different times over the past 12 months. FHA will require a 90 percent LTV ratio for these borrowers to refinance.
HUD said the expanded FHASecure guidelines are set to be implemented on July 14 in conjunction with risk-based premium pricing.
HUD estimates that FHASecure has helped 150,000 borrowers refinance since the program was launched and that the expanded guidelines will help as many as 500,000 homeowners take advantage of the program by the end of the year. FHASecure accounted for $28.5 billion of the $68 billion in loans FHA has helped facilitate since September, HUD says.
Democrats are pushing for an even bigger, $300 billion expansion of FHA loan guarantee programs to enable up to 2 million FHA-backed refinance loans in cases where lenders agree to accept no more than 85 percent of a property's current appraised value. That plan, which is opposed by the Bush administration, is part of the housing bill HR 3121 approved by the House Thursday (see story).
***
Wednesday, May 7, 2008
To refinance or not to refinance, that is the question.
To refinance or not to refinance, that is the question. This may not be as simple of a question as you may think. Refinancing involves time, energy and money. There are times when refinancing is not worthwhile and then there are times when it is advisable. . Let’s look at a few of the scenarios which may indicate that it is a good time to refinance:
1. The current rate is lower than your loan rate. There is not an easy formula of how much lower the rate needs to be for it to be financially profitable, but generally speaking, a difference of one percentage point can make a difference of hundreds of dollars a year. A savings of even $500 a year can make the process of refinancing worthwhile over the life of a 30 year loan.
2. Your credit score has improved. The Fair Isaac Corporation, or FICO, has a rating system that quite simply rates the amount of risk a lending institution sees in you as a borrower. If you had a poor FICO, and received a loan, you may have had either a bad rate, or loan terms which may be less than favorable. If you have been able to improve your FICO, it may be in your best interest to refinance. Contact a loan professional to see if you may benefit.
3. Your financial situation has changed for the better. Lenders make decisions based off of your overall financial representation. Should you change jobs and receive an increase in salary or maybe pay off a large debt, you may want to look at a refinance as well. Your overall financial picture of debt compared to income can impact your loan rate and loan terms. Another time to look at refinancing is if your home has changed in value. Many people like to pay off high interest credit card debt with the lower interest based on the equity of their home.
Everyone’s financial scenario is different, thus the answer to the question of to refinance or not to refinance depends on getting good financial advice from a trusted and knowledgeable loan professional.
Homeland Capital Mortgage is located in Tulsa, OK and makes home loans to first time home buyer to luxury home buyers.
1. The current rate is lower than your loan rate. There is not an easy formula of how much lower the rate needs to be for it to be financially profitable, but generally speaking, a difference of one percentage point can make a difference of hundreds of dollars a year. A savings of even $500 a year can make the process of refinancing worthwhile over the life of a 30 year loan.
2. Your credit score has improved. The Fair Isaac Corporation, or FICO, has a rating system that quite simply rates the amount of risk a lending institution sees in you as a borrower. If you had a poor FICO, and received a loan, you may have had either a bad rate, or loan terms which may be less than favorable. If you have been able to improve your FICO, it may be in your best interest to refinance. Contact a loan professional to see if you may benefit.
3. Your financial situation has changed for the better. Lenders make decisions based off of your overall financial representation. Should you change jobs and receive an increase in salary or maybe pay off a large debt, you may want to look at a refinance as well. Your overall financial picture of debt compared to income can impact your loan rate and loan terms. Another time to look at refinancing is if your home has changed in value. Many people like to pay off high interest credit card debt with the lower interest based on the equity of their home.
Everyone’s financial scenario is different, thus the answer to the question of to refinance or not to refinance depends on getting good financial advice from a trusted and knowledgeable loan professional.
Homeland Capital Mortgage is located in Tulsa, OK and makes home loans to first time home buyer to luxury home buyers.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)